Hamid Reza Seyyed Hosseinzadeh, MD; Ali Akbar Esmaieliejah, MD; Seyyed Morteza Kazemi, MD; Mohammad Reza Bigdeli, MD; Mohammad Ali Jalili, MD; Farivar Baghery, MD; Reza Zandi, MD; Seyyed Reza Aghapoor, MD;; Ali Akbar Esmaieliejah, MD; Alireza Eajazi, MD; Farshad Safdari, MSc
Abstract
Background: Unstable pelvic fractures are major orthopaedic injuries with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Open surgical stabilization is the standard treatment for a great number of them. Percutaneous surgical fixation has become an accepted treatment method in last several years. We would like ...
Read More
Background: Unstable pelvic fractures are major orthopaedic injuries with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Open surgical stabilization is the standard treatment for a great number of them. Percutaneous surgical fixation has become an accepted treatment method in last several years. We would like to report our experience with this relatively, newer technique in a small mixed group of unstable pelvic ring fractures.Methods: This is a report of 16 cases (13 males, 3 females) with mean age of 31±8 years of pelvic and acetabular fractures who received percutaneous iliosacral or iliopubic screw fixation, under C-arm imaging control, and had a 6 months period of clinical and radiographic follow-up.Results: All 16 cases had healed their fractures at follow-up and had full weight-bearing status. 12 cases returned to their pre-fracture activities. One screw break and one wound infection were the complications list. There was no neurological deficit, and average blood loss was 10 milliliters.Conclusion: Percutaneous iliosacral or iliopubic screw fixation for, respectively, posterior pelvic ring or anterior column acetabular injuries are useful surgical treatment options with low complication rates.
Seyyed Morteza Kazemi, MD; Reza Minaei, MD; Mohammad Ali Okhovatpoor, MD; Ramin Farhang Zanganeh, MD; Mohammad Reza Bigdeli, MD; Seyed Reza Aghapour, MD
Abstract
Background: The role of a mobile-bearing knee arthroplasty is still not clear. This study was designed to compare the mobile and fixed-bearing prosthesis.Methods: In 30 knees a fixed-bearing and in 38 knees a mobile-bearing prosthesis was used. The results were compared using the "Knee Society Scoring ...
Read More
Background: The role of a mobile-bearing knee arthroplasty is still not clear. This study was designed to compare the mobile and fixed-bearing prosthesis.Methods: In 30 knees a fixed-bearing and in 38 knees a mobile-bearing prosthesis was used. The results were compared using the "Knee Society Scoring System".Results: The mobile-bearing group of patients had an average age of 65 and 34 months average follow-up. The fixed-bearing group had an average age of 69 years and a mean follow-up of 30 months. The average knee score, functional score and overall score in the mobile-bearing group rose from 29, 45, 73 to 64, 67, 128 and in the fixed-bearing group from 31.7, 34, 65.9 to 68, 57, 125 prospectively. The difference between two groups was not significant statistically.Conclusion: Although in both groups the average knee scores increased after the operation, there were, however, no significant difference between knee scores in the two types in short-term, and no preference between two types of prosthesis.
